![]() The fact that the marriage lasted six years without sex means that it had to be more than that. OK, but even if Effie was having her period on her wedding night, it would be over in a week or so. We suppose it’s possible, but to our knowledge, a little pubic hair never stopped a man from consummating his marriage before.Īnother biographer, Peter Fuller, wrote, “It has been said that was frightened on the wedding night by the sight of his wife’s pubic hair more probably, he was perturbed by her menstrual blood.” Others, like Ruskin’s biographer Mary Lutyens, thought that since Ruskin’s only interaction with the female form came from studying smooth, white, Greek statues, that seeing her pubic hair would have been a shock to him. However, there are no known sexual liaisons or romantic letters linking Ruskin to other men. Of course, this was a time where gay marriage wasn’t an option and being a homosexual was not accepted for a wealthy gentleman. Not only was Ruskin not attracted to Effie, it seems he was repulsed by her. On the contrary, there were certain circumstances in her person which completely checked it.” But though her face was beautiful, her person was not formed to excite passion. ![]() ![]() In a statement to his lawyer, Ruskin admitted, “It may be thought strange that I could abstain from a woman who to most people was so attractive. “ alleged various reasons, hatred of children, religious motives, a desire to preserve my beauty, and finally this last year he told me his true reason… that he had imagined women were quite different to what he saw I was, and that the reason he did not make me his wife was because he was disgusted with my person the first evening 10th April.” Some clues emerge when we take a look at a letter Effie wrote to her father, where she explains what Ruskin told her was the reason he would not have sex with her. So, why would a man like Ruskin, who was so fond of Effie when she was young, not want to have a sexual relationship with her when she became his wife? This question has become the subject of much speculation over the last 150 years, inspiring numerous writings, plays and movies. Effie was able to obtain an annulment on the grounds of impotence and left the marriage still a virgin. Six lonely years passed for Effie, with no marital consummation. In real life and in the film, Effie presented herself naked to her husband on their wedding night, but he refused her - an act that would certainly upset any doting bride. More: Exclusive clip: Susan Sarandon, Dakota Fanning bare their claws in Errol Flynn biopicĮffie was 19 when she and Ruskin were married. It was a fairy story called The King of the Golden River, which dealt with themes of nature, self-sacrifice and the rewards of a powerful dwarf king. When Effie was 12, Ruskin was 22 and befriended the pretty young girl, even writing a book for her. “You forget where you are,” his mother hisses.The real Euphemia “Effie” Gray was brought up in Scotland, in a home where John Ruskin’s own grandfather, John Thomas Ruskin, killed himself - a grim omen that would hang over Effie’s troubled marriage to John Ruskin like a dark cloud.īut Gray and Ruskin had known each other for seven years before they were married. And she’s not allowed to protest her lonely lot. Ruskin has no time or interest, in ANY way, in Effie. When Effie moves in with her husband and his parents, she sees his passion is only for the work his exacting father (David Suchet) and smothering martinet mother (Julie Waters) have groomed him for. Turner,” for those who caught that biopic of the famed pre-impressionist English landscape artist.īut Ruskin was schooled for nothing less. He was the first to recognize the genius of “Mr. She “loves” him and accepts his proposal and moves from Scotland to London with the great man. Thompson wrote this vehicle, which co-stars her husband Greg Wise, and she’s not so great an actress that we can’t read “This dull child is absolutely ruining my wonderful period piece” in her performance.Įuphemia “Effie” Gray was the obsession of her much-older suitor, the artist, critic and “greatest (art) teacher of our time,” John Ruskin. You can see it in the pained smiles of Emma Thompson, her co-star in “Effie Gray,” in which Fanning plays an ill-used child bride in the art world of Victorian Britain. Dead-eyed and expressionless, the once-wondrous child actress hasn’t matured into anyone worth building a movie around. Whatever “it” is, that spark that film actresses and actors have that makes them interesting and empathetic and anything else on the screen, Fanning doesn’t have it. So perhaps the cruel truth can be at last be said about Dakota Fanning without fear of being called a child-abuser.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |